Livestock & Deforestation

Introduction

Cattle grazing is the #1 driver of deforestation, followed by soy (70-75% of which is used as livestock food, 6% is eaten by humans), palm products (also becoming a major feed source, currently the UK feeds 10% of the world's palm meal to livestock and pets), followed by the timber industry. The cattle industry alone is responsible for the majority of deforestation in the Amazon (80%) and Australia with "More than 90% of land clearing in Great Barrier Reef catchments over a five-year period was attributable to the beef industry, according to new analysis by The Wilderness Society."


People often brag that Europe has virtually no deforestation for livestock farming, but that is because we have steadily deforested Europe since the Neolithic period to make space for grazing animals and later for growing their feed. Now we have so little land left that we're exporting our deforestation to places like Asia and South America to support our growing livestock industries.

Negative Effects of Deforestation & Livestock

Forest Structure

Deforestation and overgrazing also have effects that are less visible. Sometimes we may see what looks like a healthy woodland at first glance, but a closer look reveals more.

Overgrazed woodland may have old trees but lack youngsters to replace them. They are also missing a healthy shrub layer and ground flora.

Not only have we lost woodland cover. Like humans, deer have their favorite foods. This means that some tree species suffer more than others. Aspen, holly, rowan and juniper are high on the menu, so they are often absent or scarce in the remaining pockets. Less tree diversity means less wildlife diversity." - Trees for Life

Loss of Wildlife

"Key wildlife species have been lost due both habitat destruction and hunting. This has had a catastrophic effect. When species are removed, the ecological tapestry begins to unravel.

The top predatorswolf, bear and lynx – were all hunted to extinction by humans. Beaver, aurochs, elk, wild boar and others suffered the same fate. These animals each have an important, unique role in a forest, keeping it rich and diverse.

Predators keep herbivore numbers in check. They also keep nibbling mouths on the move, allowing vegetation to regenerate. A lack of predators is a major reason why deer numbers are now so damagingly high.

Herbivores’ feeding habits in turn create a varied structure in the forest, along with other important effects. Many other less obvious creatures have also been lost or have had their numbers decimated." - Trees for Life

Biomass Loss vs Carbon Storage

Plants make up the majority of Earth's organic biomass. Removing trees removes very large carbon stores, which can then be released into the atmosphere, especially when forest clearing is done via fire. 

As mentioned above, changes to woodland structures results in trophic cascade where once-common species begin to dwindle or even vanish, meaning yet most biomass is lost and can end up back in our atmosphere.

Water Cycle

Deforestation impairs the water cycle, and since beef is responsible for 5 times more deforestation than any other industry, we can safely say that the disruption of "rivers in the sky" historically produced by rainforests can be attributed at least in part to the meat and feed industries. 

Cattle and other grazers like sheep and goats do a lot of damage to trees and saplings, further reducing future water cycle opportunities. Their hooves can impact earth, adding another layer of barrier against water penetrating back into ground water. 

When farmers over extract water from aquifers and waterways, this can rob the landscape of water that might otherwise sustain tree life.

In wetter climates, the problem can be quite different as explained by Trees for Life, "Trees draw up a huge amount of water from the ground, and release it into the air through their leaves and needles. When trees are cut down the ground can become waterlogged. This makes it hard for trees to return, especially when the seed source has been removed. It’s a vicious cycle."

Impact By Region

Since different industries have different impacts at different times, we've collected information about the impacts of livestock on forests areound the world, both in the past and modern times. It may surprise some people to learn that places we commonly think of as deserts or scrubland used to be lush forests with rich biodiversity until nomadic herders or farmers impacted those regions.

International/Global

The top 4 drivers of deforestation are Beef Grazing, Soy which is mostly fed to livestock (especially chicken), palm (an important ingredient in livestock feed), and finally wood products. Click the Deforestation button to learn about other major causes of deforestation and threats to forests

Africa

Ethiopia

The article listed here explains a variety of threats to the last remaining forests of Ethiopia, including "how wandering livestock were damaging the delicate understory." as well as "Cattle wandering into the cool, shady forests trample tender young plants and damage the older trees."

Asia

Europe

Ireland

Scotland

"Early farmers arrived on the scene about 5,900 years ago. (Humans had been around much earlier, but we don’t know what impact they had.) These Neolithic farmers grazed cattle, goats and primitive sheep. They burned areas of heath and pinewoods to encourage fresh growth of heather for their stock. Burning plus grazing was bad news for trees. Woodland couldn’t recolonise denuded areas and went into further retreat."

...

"Through the centuries that followed, people cut down trees for timber, fuel and to make way for agriculture. Livestock grazing continued to limit tree regeneration. The forest was forced into smaller, isolated pockets."

...

"By the 18th century, woodland cover reached its all time low. Some pinewood fragments were protected from overgrazing because timber had value, but cheap timber imports later changed all that.

The Highland Clearances were a devastating blow for Highland people and culture. They also made way for large scale sheep farming, which was an ecological disaster.

In Victorian times sheep farming declined and landlords turned to sport shooting for income. Deer stalking encouraged unnaturally high numbers of deer and grouse moors were burned. Regenerating trees stood little chance."

...

"Such large-scale, long-term ecological destruction has transformed the Scottish Highlands. Today only around 1% of our native pinewoods remain, while many other habitats have been degraded or lost. The besieged remnants are in a state of poor health for many reasons."

 - Trees for Life

UK

Asia

North America

USA

Much of the USA's forests have already been destroyed for agriculture. Specifically, tree clearing over the last 100-200 years has wiped out entire ecosystems, replacing them in large part with corn, soy, oats, and alfalfa, which are major feed crops for livestock. Some of that land is also used for livestock grazing, though around 99% of US livestock now live inside factory farms full time. Beef cattle are often grazed as youngsters, then moved to feed lots shortly before slaughter.

South America

Brazil

Just a few years ago, the beef industry was responsible for 80-90% of deforestation in Brazil's rainforests, however, since the new president, the rate of deforestation has dropped

Solutions

Switch to Alternatives

We should support farmers switching from livestock to more eco-friendly alternatives. Since the majority of deforestation throughout history and still today is driven by livestock grazing and feed production, one of the fastest ways to reverse this trend is for farmers to switch to less intensive products.

Farmer Actions

Click the Alternatives to Livestock button to learn about some of the alternatives already being explored by ex-livestock owners from tourism and event hosting to algae and crop alternatives.

For those without the resources to transition away from livestock right away, consider planting trees to create the following:

Consumer Actions

We can support plant, mushroom, and seaweed farmers by seeking their products.

If you don't know where to start, you can create bigger impact faster if you focus on replacing the worst causes of deforestation first, then worrying about the less-impactful products later. Check out our Deforestation page to see which foods and products impact forests the most, to guide you on your journey.

Rewild Grazing Land

All around the world different people, groups, and initiatives are taking things into their own hands, and returning land to nature. 

Side by Side

This can include farmers sectioning off parts of their land to become Riparian Zones, or strips of wildflowers referred to as Prairie Strips or Meadow Strips depending on the location and ecological zones that would have once stood on that land.

Hedgerows are another option which provides many benefits to farmers as well as the local biodiversity.

One with Nature

Silvopasture and Paludiculture are examples of ways we can start to return land back to a more natural state, while still allowing farmers to earn an income.

Organizations 

Europe

Scotland

UK

Grants

International

North America

USA

Related Topics